topbanner.gif
Teachers union files suit vs. District 911 Print E-mail
Tuesday, 24 November 2009

By Rachel Kytonen
rachel.kytonen@ecm-inc.com

The Education Minnesota Cambridge Isanti (EMCI) teachers union has filed an unfair labor practice lawsuit against District 911.

The suit was made public during a negotiations update presented by Board Member Dan Fosse, who also serves as lead negotiator, during the board’s regular meeting Thursday, Nov. 19.

However, further details and positions on the lawsuit, claiming the district violated the teachers’ current contract, are not being divulged at this time as meetings are ongoing between the groups involved.

Fosse, who later presented impacts of the failed levy before the school board, provided a time line on negotiation talks, which began June 3, between the district and EMCI. Several subsequent meetings have been held since that date.

Both parties agreed to the Interest Based Collective Bargaining (IBCB) negotiation meeting format in addition to using a mediator from the Bureau of Mediation with the understanding either party could opt out and resume traditional bargaining.

The district presented EMCI with a formal proposal on Sept. 21. EMCI presented a counter proposal on Nov. 11, and the district presented a counter proposal also on that same date.

The district exercised its option to end the IBCB meeting format and also filed for traditional bargaining mediation at the Oct. 1 meeting.

EMCI then filed the unfair labor practice lawsuit against the district on Nov. 17. In response, the district canceled the scheduled mediation meeting Nov. 18.

Financial impacts

In light of the failed levy referendum on Nov. 3, Fosse said the financial impact has increased the stakes and importance of current negotiations for all stakeholders: District 911, employees, taxpayers and most importantly, students.

Fosse explained each negotiation team, designated for each union group, has consistently delivered the school board’s position and goal in the current round of negotiations to not cut any more staff or make further reductions in programs.

This was done by asking all employees and unions to consider and accept wage and benefit freezes to help maneuver through the financial challenges the district faces.

As of date, the superintendent, district administrative team and instructional assistants union groups have agreed to wage and benefit freeze requests at the fiscal year 2008-09 amounts.

Negotiations are critical, Fosse said, because expenditures in the district will increase at a significantly higher rate than revenue will increase.

Fosse said the district will experience a net reduction of approximately $250,000 of revenue from the state of Minnesota in fiscal year 2009-10 and another loss of about $900,000 ($600,000 of local levy and $300,000 of equalized state aid revenue) in fiscal year 2010-11.

In addition, Fosse said, the state has not budgeted any increase in general revenue for fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Fosse said the state of Minnesota has also shifted the payment of revenue to school districts in fiscal year 2009-10 from 90 percent to 73 percent in the current fiscal year. This change represents a payment deferment from the state in 2009-10 to the district of $10,988,614 (27 percent) versus $4,069,857 (10 percent).

“This shift will significantly affect District 911 cash flow and will require the use of existing cash balance and extensive borrowing,” Fosse said. “I want the board to be aware that even small percentages will translate into very large amounts of money.

“Negotiations with all employees and union groups is especially important when you consider District 911 is a people intensive organization and that $38,880,572 or 78 percent of all expenditures totaling $50,309,137—not including construction, debt service and student activity accounts in fiscal year 2008-09—were either directly or indirectly related to wages and benefits,” he added.

Custodians union

Contract negotiations with the custodian’s unions opened on Nov. 17, and initial discussion included identifying specific issues the custodians would like to discuss. The district reaffirmed its position asking the group to consider and accept wage and benefit freezes. More meetings are scheduled in December.

Administrative assistants, food service

There isn’t any meeting scheduled yet to open negotiations with the administrative assistants union. An initial meeting is scheduled for Nov. 30 to open negotiations with food service.

Bus drivers

Contract negotiations with the bus drivers opened on Oct. 6. The bus driver group presented issues that need resolution and some requests to clarify current contract language, and the district reaffirmed its position in asking for wage and benefit freezes. Both parties agreed to review a draft of a reorganized contract that would include the items discussed. The district is preparing the draft and the next meeting will be scheduled once it’s completed.

Principals Association

Contract negotiations with the district and principals’ association opened on Nov. 20. The discussion included financial restraints, medical and dental insurance benefits and clarification of the district’s position regarding wage and benefit freezes.

The district asked the principal’s association if it would consider the contract format recently implemented with the superintendent and district administration. The principal association agreed, and the alternate contract was reviewed and discussed Nov. 10.

Both parties agreed the association should have time to discuss the merits of the alternative contract with all principals. No additional meetings have been scheduled.

In other action, the board:

• Accepted $4,283.50 in donations, including $1,780 through a test drive fundraiser from Hayford Ford for the high school student council and $1,500 from the Isanti County Sportsman’s Club for the Cambridge Middle School’s Long Lake Conservation Camp student trip.

• Approved revised seniority lists fro the food service, paraprofessional, custodial and instructional assistants union groups effective Dec. 1.

• Approved a resolution relating to the expulsion of a student for one year beginning Nov. 11.

• Granted approval for students to attend the Model United Nations Conference at the University of Michigan Jan. 13-18 and University of Chicago Feb. 3-7.

Comments (13)add
taxpayer: ridiculous
Oh the school is having money problems and wants teachers and custodians to freeze or they will have to get in debt and borrow money ? Are you serious? they don't want to but they expect them to go into debt lose their home actually it would be a pay cut not freeze things always go up. keep up the fight unions if the schools do not go into debt and borrow money the goverment will never step in to help the states as long as they can ride on the backs of their hard working employees .Teachers, custodians, paras, bus drivers ext fight them and make them go into debt not us. believe me these area schools look pretty good inside and they still order equipment, supplies computers,ext The buck stops here get your pay equity and the raise you deserve administration does. lets show everyone when the moneys gone it's gone and that is not by taking from the hardest labor unions there teachers,custodians ,bus drivers ,paras
1

November 25, 2009
Bigger Taxpayer: Previous comment = Ridculous
Apperantly taxpayer does not understand the economy. When there is no money to spend, where do we get it from. The taxpayers. When the taxpayers are losing their jobs in the private sector, they have no money to give you. It is really simple. If they do not want a wage freeze, I am sure there are hundreds of people would love the opportunity to teach in Cambridge for less money. Do not tell me, longevity (tenure) equals better education. People that are hungry, produce better results.
2

November 27, 2009
JG: what????????
Could somebody please translate taxpayer:ridiculous' comment. Has this person ever heard of having a coherent sentence. I certainly hope this person is NOT in the education business. I'm sorry, I haven't received a salary increase in 2 years, but I'm thankful to have a job and would never, ever go to my employer and demand an increase, even though I'm receiving less and less take home pay do to increased health insurance costs.
3

November 30, 2009
Sara: what would you do?
Think about what you'd do if your employer illegally changed your contract of employment. This has nothing to do with the levy failing. The school district is to blame. The teachers are only doing what they should be doing. It's not about money. Teachers in this district are FAR from greedy. Teachers here are not making a lot of money, especially when you figure in how much a 4 year degree costs and continuing education. When I read the comments on the failed levy I realized that many members of this community could use a little education themselves. The school is talking about a 4 day school week, which I am for, and think it would really wake up the community. The community won't vote for a 15/month tax increase (which would only replace an expiring one so taxes wouldn't have actually gone up that much), but now they will have to pay for a day of daycare each week, which will cost a lot more than 15 bucks. THe failed levy is going to cost more to families than if they voted yes, I say they deserve what is coming.
4

November 30, 2009
Hanna: Illegally changing contract....
I believe it is called negotiation. Just because the District is not accepting the Unions demands does not make it illegal. The teachers need to realize that everyone is taking pay freezes, pay cuts or being laid off. Join the rest of us in the real world.
5

December 01, 2009
Linda: ...
Sara, you have the typical attitude that everyone that does not agree with you is stupid or uneducated. You think with your emotions, not with common sense or knowing all of the facts. The levy that failed not only was to keep the old levy in place but it increased that levy. And it was a substantial increase. I am college educated with a 4 year accounting degree. My company implemented a company wide 10% pay cut in February and a lot of companies have also done this to prevent layoffs. My household did not suffer too much in this as I live pretty conservatively (i.e. I drive an older car, I don't have a fancy tv, I've owned my home for 18 years thus I don't have a huge mortgage, etc).

However, if you think so strongly with your emotions, you should have some feelings for your neighbors who haven't been so fortunate. They are many of our neighbors who have young families, large mortgages and may have lost their jobs or taken pay cuts. These families are having trouble making ends meet as it is. Adding to their tax burden may be just enough to put them over the edge financially.

It is possible if the levy would have been the same dollar amount without an increase, the levy may have pasted. But I still would have voted NO. But they got greedy with the levy which guaranteed its failure.

What the District is doing is not illegal. The unions may not like it but it's time to re-negotiate the contracts that were written in better times.
6

December 02, 2009
Jim: Hanna: Actually
It is illegal because the contract that the district is not honoring was signed in the last round of negotiations. They are breaking a legal document or agreement. The union is doing what anyone would do when a legal document is not honored. They are making sure that it is. I believe you are confusing the current negotiations with ones that have happened in the past.

I am sure that in that in the current negotiations both sides will act in the best interests of the community and the students they serve.
7

December 02, 2009
jonz2008: ...
Will criminal charges be considered since the district is violating a legal contract?
8

December 02, 2009
Sara: ...
Maybe Hanna and Linda can read the new article posted today so they can believe what I said before. The District ABSOLUTELY broke the law when they changed current contracts, that is why today they conceded and didn't let the suit go to trial. Read your facts before you start proclaiming you know everything that is going on.
9

December 03, 2009
futuredadofastudent: contract ended June 30, 2009
check it out

http://cambridgeisanti.educationminnesota.org/index.cfm?page_id=19369
10

December 04, 2009
futuredadofastudent: ...
Negotiations and bargaining begins July 1, 2009..
11

December 04, 2009
MRS: a contract is a contract
is a contract.
12

December 04, 2009
Hanna: Proclamation
Sara, I don't believe I proclaimed to know everything that is going on. That would be rather arrogant.
13

December 05, 2009
Write comment

busy
 
< Prev   Next >